PDA

View Full Version : Graphic Details


MihaiS
16 Sep 2008, 20:59
Isn't this the best graphic detail level ever?

http://www.flash-bug.com/_RubberWorm/interface.png

Koen-ftw
16 Sep 2008, 21:34
Not really. Having forced water in the foreground can cause some funny stuff, where you have to carefully negotiate a hole in the ground, for instance in a Team17 game.

But since WxW is pr0 liek dat you ofcourse need to remove water to make sure you can rope without any distractions which could make you less pr0!

KRD
16 Sep 2008, 21:58
That's cheating according to Deadcode.

StoneFrog
16 Sep 2008, 22:24
And I consider WxW incredibly boring and against the true Worms spirit.

franpa
17 Sep 2008, 07:24
Also, it's obvious how you do it. Via editing the water.dat file on the cd ;)

MihaiS
17 Sep 2008, 09:49
Also, it's obvious how you do it. Via editing the water.dat file on the cd ;)

No. I wouldn't bother.

And I consider WxW incredibly boring and against the true Worms spirit.

I had the same feeling about WxW during my first week of worms. I understand you.

That's cheating according to Deadcode.

Yay! The first cheat by accident. I feel special.

Not really. Having forced water in the foreground can cause some funny stuff, where you have to carefully negotiate a hole in the ground, for instance in a Team17 game.

But since WxW is pr0 liek dat you ofcourse need to remove water to make sure you can rope without any distractions which could make you less pr0!

Water is still there, waves aren't. The sea is calm.

Isn't this the best graphic detail level ever?

http://www.flash-bug.com/_RubberWorm/interface.png

No, you dumb nøøb!

yakuza
17 Sep 2008, 10:08
I had the same feeling about WxW during my first week of worms. I understand you.

This is because you evolved from noob phase 1 to noob phase 2. Don't worry, after two to 10 years you'll have the same opinion you had in noob phase 1, that WxW sucks.

MihaiS
17 Sep 2008, 10:15
This is because you evolved from noob phase 1 to noob phase 2. Don't worry, after two to 10 years you'll have the same opinion you had in noob phase 1, that WxW sucks.

In two to ten years I'll have a wife.

CyberShadow
17 Sep 2008, 10:21
In two to ten years I'll have a wife.
That hasn't stopped many from playing.

MihaiS
17 Sep 2008, 10:34
That hasn't stopped many from playing.

Yes, but it stopped many from thinking straight.

yakuza
17 Sep 2008, 10:38
Yes, but it stopped many from thinking straight.

No need to think straight to enjoy a game of worms. :p

MihaiS
17 Sep 2008, 10:43
No need to think straight to enjoy a game of worms. :p

Not even to conclude WxW sucks?

Melon
17 Sep 2008, 22:14
No need to think straight to enjoy a game of worms. :p
Not if it's with your wife, if you know what I mean.

Anyway, removing the waves is technically cheating because it can give an advantage that is brought about from a client-side only "hack". Eventually, it MAY become a scheme option, but for now even transparent waves form Cybershadow's water colour editor are cheating.

Also, wXw sucks. Well, it sucks on any map except this (http://www.kieranmillar.com/wa/moon_station_w3w_by_Melon.png) one.

knkn
20 Sep 2008, 20:33
..but for now even transparent waves form Cybershadow's water colour editor are cheating.

That's why mine are black, cause I'd nevar g0 back!

b1llygo4t
22 Sep 2008, 09:06
i use the demo lava water scheme that comes with wk. its cool